Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:32:56PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > The only supported combinations are distributions with the kernels they > > ship. > > I think you're being unreasonable here. Absolutely. The statement is also completely false. Fedora rebases to a new point release short

Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-22 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:20 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:47:07PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:48:48AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Do we really have to wait the three years between stable Debian releases > > > for removing an obsolete d

Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:47:07PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:48:48AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Do we really have to wait the three years between stable Debian releases > > for removing an obsolete driver that has always been marked as > > EXPERIMENTAL? > > >

Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-22 Thread Benjamin LaHaise
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:48:48AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Do we really have to wait the three years between stable Debian releases > for removing an obsolete driver that has always been marked as > EXPERIMENTAL? > > Please be serious. I am completely serious. The traditional cycle of obso

Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:11:50AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > +What: Traffic Shaper (CONFIG_SHAPER) > > +When: July 2006 > > +Why:obsoleted by the code in net/sched/ > > +Who:Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This

Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-19 Thread Benjamin LaHaise
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:11:50AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > +What: Traffic Shaper (CONFIG_SHAPER) > +When: July 2006 > +Why:obsoleted by the code in net/sched/ > +Who:Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED] This length of obsolete cycles is way too short -- it's not even enough time for a s

Re: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-19 Thread Jan Engelhardt
>Subject: [2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal Replaced by what; the QoS subsystem? > config SHAPER >- tristate "Traffic Shaper (EXPERIMENTAL)" >+ tristate "Traffic Shaper (OBSOLETE)" > depends on EXPERIMENTAL Jan Engel

[2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch was already sent on: - 13 Jan 2006 --- linux-2.6.15-mm3-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2006-01-13 15:02:15.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.15-mm3-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2006-01-

[2.6 patch] schedule SHAPER for removal

2006-01-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:58:58AM +, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mer, 2006-01-11 at 01:53 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > shaper is completely obsolete and it's probably best to just remove > > all references to it and the kernel driver too. > > I would agree with that but it nees to go through a prope