Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/: possible cleanups

2006-07-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:29:51PM +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote: > On 06-07-16 14:17 Daniel Drake wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > >This patch contains the following possible cleanups: > > >- make needlessly global functions static > > >- #if 0 unused functions > > > > > >Please review which of t

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/: possible cleanups

2006-07-17 Thread Ulrich Kunitz
On 06-07-16 14:17 Daniel Drake wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >This patch contains the following possible cleanups: > >- make needlessly global functions static > >- #if 0 unused functions > > > >Please review which of these functions do make sense and which do > >conflict with pending patches. >

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/: possible cleanups

2006-07-16 Thread Daniel Drake
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 unused functions Please review which of these functions do make sense and which do conflict with pending patches. Thanks Adrian. I have put this in my tree and made an add

[2.6 patch] drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/: possible cleanups

2006-07-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 unused functions Please review which of these functions do make sense and which do conflict with pending patches. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch was already sen

[2.6 patch] drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/: possible cleanups

2006-07-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 unused functions Please review which of these functions do make sense and which do conflict with pending patches. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/wireless/zd12