On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:54:32AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >Subject: e1000 resume weirdness
> >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/26/91
> >Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Handled-By : Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Auke Kok <[EM
* Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >Subject: e1000 resume weirdness
> >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/26/91
> >Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Handled-By : Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: e1000 resume weirdness
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/26/91
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Handled-By : Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : problem is being debugged
The issue comes f
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
