David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:51:24 -0800
>
>
>>How come?
>
>
> Because you can't enable ebt_ulog and ebt_log at the same time.
>
> All of the ULOG targets are obsolete, but are kept around for
> compatability.
>
> It's problemati
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:36:43 -0800
>
> > Would it be possible to do s/init/ebt_ulog_init/etc?
>
> I agree, that would be most welcome.
whee, 120 files. Gimme fifteen..
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:36:43 -0800
> Would it be possible to do s/init/ebt_ulog_init/etc?
I agree, that would be most welcome.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordom
5196f6: init+0x0/0x16()
> Calling initcall 0xc051970c: init+0x0/0x42()
> Calling initcall 0xc051974e: init+0x0/0x132()
> ebt_ulog: not logging via ulog since somebody else already registered for
> PF_BRIDGE
> Calling initcall 0xc0519880: init_sunrpc+0x0/0x51()
> Calling
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:51:24 -0800
> How come?
Because you can't enable ebt_ulog and ebt_log at the same time.
All of the ULOG targets are obsolete, but are kept around for
compatability.
It's problematic when these things are all built statically into
via ulog since somebody else already registered for
PF_BRIDGE
Calling initcall 0xc0519880: init_sunrpc+0x0/0x51()
Calling initcall 0xc05198d1: init_rpcsec_gss+0x0/0x3f()
Calling initcall 0xc0519910: init_kerberos_module+0x0/0x32()
Calling initcall 0xc04fde5e: amd_exit_cpu+0x0/0x11()
Calling initcall
