Re: 2.6.24 regression: reference count leak in PPPoE

2008-01-20 Thread nigel
sed card. It was introduced by a Jan 10 commit post rc7 (sorry, don't have the details right now - my laptop died yesterday). A bugzilla has already been opened. Nigel This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-04 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 00:53 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2007-06-05 08:49:04, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 00:41 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-04 Thread Nigel Cunningham
he way I suggested is nicer, IIRC akpm invented it. It keeps > ifdefs localized around the block that _needs_ to be ifdefed. The localised point is true. I'll also admit that 'nicer'/'uglier' is a matter of aesthetics and therefore personal opinion. I guess that leaves the question, "What's the precedent to follow?" or "Is there a driver that's already got this new format?". Regards, Nigel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-04 Thread Nigel Cunningham
h(dev); > > > + } > > > + } > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > #else > > #define *_resume NULL > > #define *_suspend NULL > > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */ > > > > > @@ -1689,6 +1775,10 @@ static struct pci_driver uli526x_driver > > > .id_table = uli526x_pci_tbl, > > > .probe = uli526x_init_one, > > > .remove = __devexit_p(uli526x_remove_one), > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > > > + .suspend= uli526x_suspend, > > > + .resume = uli526x_resume, > > > +#endif > > > > ...so that this ifdef is not needed? > > OK, why not. Because it's uglier and #ifdef is the established way of doing things? Regards, Nigel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part