Re: [PATCH net] net: sungem: fix rx checksum support

2018-08-26 Thread mroos
> BTW, removing the FCS also means GRO is going to work, finally on this NIC ;) > > GRO does not like packets with padding. As a follow-up, I am seeing hw csum failures on Sun V440 that has onboard Sun Cassini with sungem driver. First tested version was 4.18 (it happened there once) and now th

Re: Invalid sk_policy[] access

2016-02-23 Thread mroos
> > Indeed, the kernel is 64-bit in both cases. > > And the userland bit-arity has no relevance whatsoever for this bug. > > hang on; The sizeof (and offsetof) values I listed were obtained either > from /usr/bin/crash (on the T5) or from simple printk's of the structures > in the case of the v440

Re: Invalid sk_policy[] access

2016-02-23 Thread mroos
> > Indeed, the kernel is 64-bit in both cases. > > And the userland bit-arity has no relevance whatsoever for this bug. > > hang on; The sizeof (and offsetof) values I listed were obtained either > from /usr/bin/crash (on the T5) or from simple printk's of the structures > in the case of the v440

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rhashtable: Allow other tasks to be scheduled in large lookup loops

2015-07-17 Thread mroos
OMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 3.31.0 2001/07/25 20:36' [0.00] PROMLIB: Root node compatible: [0.00] Linux version 4.2.0-rc2-00077-gf760b87-dirty (mroos@u5) (gcc version 4.9.3 (Debian 4.9.3-1) ) #21 Fri Jul 17 20:15:21 EEST 2015 [0.00] bootconsole [earlyp

Re: [PATCH v2] rhashtable: fix for resize events during table walk

2015-07-14 Thread mroos
> If rhashtable_walk_next detects a resize operation in progress, it jumps > to the new table and continues walking that one. But it misses to drop > the reference to it's current item, leading it to continue traversing > the new table's bucket in which the current item is sorted into, and > after