also sprach YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.14.1206
+0100]:
> Very confusing to me...
FYI:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/2008-January/000214.html
However, I am not entirely convinced. I think
conference/tool/protocol are far apart enough so that the
also sprach David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.14.0312 +0100]:
> > I think you may be mixing things up, and it may be my fault in
> > ways. I am developing netconf: http://netconf.alioth.debian.org.
> > I am aware of the NETCONF protocol and have considered renaming
> > my project, but looki
also sprach Andy Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.12.0752 +0100]:
> I saw somewhere (maybe in this mailing list a while ago) that
> there might be a Linux Kernel Developers' Netconf conference at
> conf.au 2008.
I think you may be mixing things up, and it may be my fault in ways.
I am develo
also sprach Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.11.1833 +0100]:
> This tweak is "recent" (2.6.16 as far as I remember), so I suppose
> the reason is to not puzzled people with a changed default
> behavior.
Your instant and helpful responses are most appreciated!
--
martin | http://maddu
also sprach Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.11.1813 +0100]:
> There is a tweak in /proc/sys which activate secondaries promotion when a
> primary is deleted.
>
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/promote_secondaries
>
> I think it changes the behavior to the one you wish.
Totally. That woul
Dear list,
When I add an address to an interface whose network prefix is the
same as that of an address already bound to the interface, the new
address becomes a secondary address. As per
http://www.policyrouting.org/iproute2.doc.html:
"secondary --- this address is not used when selecting the
