Yes, Hugo Santos suggested me to use the minimum of both, the new
patch is available there :
http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch2
Thanks,
Hoerdt Mickaël
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:13:44PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
In my precedent mails, i pointed out that IPV6_MTU setsockopt
was ineffective because the field frag_size was not used further
in the ipv6 fragment code of the kernel. You can check out
that this is the case by this simple proof of concept code :
http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/mtu.c
you don't change the value of
net.core.opmem_max, would it make sense to increase net.ipv6.mld_max_msf
to let say, 256 ? the rest of the memory can
still be used for various option setup on the socket.
Cheers,
Hoerdt Mickaël
David Stevens wrote:
[I'm CC-ing Dave Miller and Yoshifuj
