Re: Is advertising of 2500Mbps support must from phy device to set phy at 2500Mbps link speed

Thanks Andrew for your reply. I will have look at IEEE document and c45. On Wednesday 06 February 2019 07:08 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: Currently, we don't have any phy drivers. Generic driver doesn't seems to support 2500Mbps. Correct. genphy only supports upto 1G. The c45 based genphy_c45 is slo

Re: Is advertising of 2500Mbps support must from phy device to set phy at 2500Mbps link speed

Hi Andrew, Thank you very much for reply. Please see my reply in-line On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:26 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:39:34AM +0530, abhijit wrote: Hi All, We are using Ethernet MAC which has integrated Phy. This phy supports speed up to 1Mbps. The

Is advertising of 2500Mbps support must from phy device to set phy at 2500Mbps link speed

(ethtool -s eth0  speed 2500 autoneg off), but the ethtool reported this configuration as invalid? 3. At the end we are targeting print of "link up (2500/Full)" Regards,   Abhijit

Re: [PATCH] Add -target to clang switch while cross compiling.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:24:06PM -0700, Abhijit Ayarekar wrote: > > Update to llvm excludes assembly instructions. > > llvm git revision is below > > > > commit 65fad7c26569 ("bpf: add in

[PATCH] Add -target to clang switch while cross compiling.

iles while cross compiling Tested on x86 and arm64. Signed-off-by: Abhijit Ayarekar --- samples/bpf/Makefile | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile index ebc2ad6..81f9fcd 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile +++ b/s

[PATCH] Add -target to clang switch while cross compiling.

-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313593 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 __ASM_SYSREG_H define is not required for native compile. -target switch includes appropriate target specific files while cross compiling Tested on x86 and arm64. Signed-off-by: Abhijit Ayarekar

[PATCH] Add -target to clang switch while cross compiling.

-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313593 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 __ASM_SYSREG_H define is not required for native compile. -target switch includes appropriate target specific files while cross compiling Tested on x86 and arm64. Signed-off-by: Abhijit Ayarekar

Re: [PATCH] Add -target to clang switches while cross compiling.

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:23:04PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:45:57PM -0700, Abhijit Ayarekar wrote: > > Latest llvm update excludes assembly instructions. > > As a result __ASM_SYSREGS_H define is not required. > > -target switch includ

[PATCH] Add -target to clang switches while cross compiling.

Sep 28 02:46:11 2017 + bpf: add new insns for bswap_to_le and negation Signed-off-by: Abhijit Ayarekar --- samples/bpf/Makefile | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile index ebc2ad6..81f9fcd 100644 --- a/samples

duplicated u32 filters in tc show output

The HTB user guide (http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm) says the following: Note: The U32 classifier has an undocumented design bug which causes duplicate entries to be listed by "tc filter show" when you use U32 classifiers with different prio values. What exactly is

Re: tc filter add ... fw ... action drop

At 2007-07-18 11:49:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle > > 0xfff fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop > > It seems this is merely a parsing error, iproute doesn't have an > "action" parameter and aborts parsing

tc filter add ... fw ... action drop

Hi. Is it a bug that: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 0xfff fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop ^^^ creates a filter that looks like: # tc filter ls dev eth0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref