Re: [PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-08-06 Thread Ulrich Weber
KOVACS Krisztian wrote: Hi, On Friday 05 August 2005 12.50, Patrick McHardy wrote: Is there already userspace code which uses this feature somewhere? AFAIK Ulrich has a patch for OpenSWAN, and we (Balabit) have a patch for racoon. Unfortunately this racoon version is available onl

Re: [PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-08-04 Thread Ulrich Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 KOVACS Krisztian wrote: > Ulrich, I already have some code which supports per-state > difference settings, along with optional time limits. I don't know > whether or not the latter would be necessary or not, but putting > the per-state diff values wou

Re: [PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-08-04 Thread Ulrich Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, thanks for revising Patrick! Attached is the updated patch. Sorry had no time yet to remove the sysctl variables. It will follow in a few weeks if I have more time :) Best regards Ulrich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (

[PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-07-18 Thread Ulrich Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, IPSec uses sequence numbers to protect against replay attacks. So far there is no way to get or set these sequence numbers in the kernel. The attached patches will remedy these issues. Any comments are welcome! :) I would be pleased if at lea