On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 04:45:21AM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > udev-free != embedded.
>
> But UNIX=m == waste RAM and have an effectively b0rken system until the
> module is loaded.
Well, the system isn't necessarily totally broken. If you don't use
udev, then system will be crippled, but no
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:23:34PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> I don't see any reason that we couldn't have a tool accessible to Ubuntu
> users that does a real "git bisect". Git is really good at being scripted
> by fancy GUIs. It should be easy enough to have a drop down with all of
> the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:33:44AM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> I'm very encouraged to read of your expanded testing efforts. As a
> bcm43xx developer, Ubuntu has been our problem distro, mostly
> because your standard kernels have debugging turned off for bcm43xx.
> When a Ubuntu user reports a pr
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros
> (gentoo->ubuntu)
> and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc or -mm kernels (I
> know this isn't a lkml problem
> but more a distro problem, but I w
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:37:15PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> But I AM TRYING TO MAKE IT COMPATIBLE!!!
>
> That's what that config option is there for. If you happen to be
> running a newer userspace, a different distro than what is in Debian
> right now, or don't use HAL and Networkmanager, then di
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:17:29PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> I should not have broken any userspace if CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is
> enabled with that patch. If that is enabled, and that patch still
> causes problems, please let me know.
But we still need to update the help text for CONFIG_SYS_DEPRE
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 01:12:42PM -0800, James Ketrenos wrote:
> Please hold all questions until I am done with this email. Thank you.
>
> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new driver for the
> Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection adapter. This new driver
> uses the ne
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:45:31PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> ASF is firmware that monitors the system and sends out alerts whenever
> certain events happen. So it needs to run before the OS boots or after
> it has crashed. When the driver is up and running, the driver and ASF
> run independent
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> True. But they also have ASF enabled which requires tg3_timer() to send
> the heartbeat periodically. If the heartbeat is late, ASF may reset the
> chip believing that the system has crashed.
Parden me for asking a dumb question, bu
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:43:11PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:28:19 -0700
>
> > > eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[1] Split[0] WireSpeed[0]
> > > TSOcap[0]
> >
> > We'll see if we can do away with the timer-based h
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:48:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > eth0: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95704s) rev 2100 PHY(serdes)] (PCIX:100MHz:64-bit)
> > 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:14:5e:86:44:24
>
> The 5704 chip will set TG3_FLAG_TAGGED_STATUS, and therefore
> doesn't need the periodic poking done by
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:36:47AM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:00 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sending this on mostly because it was a bit of a pain to track down,
> >
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:49:17AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Interesting. On my Dell D610 notebook with tg3 and vpn,
> I have to ping a server on the vpn to keep it alive, otherwise
> it disappears soon and I have to restart the vpn. Of course,
> this could just be the vpn or some other softwa
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:46:37AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> There is some form of priority inheritance on the timer softirq. It said
> in the patch header that the right fix was for the timer softirq to
> change priorities. Which Real Time patch are you using? Or is the
> current system not su
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:00:35PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sending this on mostly because it was a bit of a pain to track down,
> > and hopefully it will save time if anyone else hits this while playing
> &g
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:41:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It's completely not acceptable to run when the EEPROM checksum fails - you
> > might even be running with the wrong MAC address, or worse. Lets fix this
> > the
> > right way instead.
>
> A printk which helps the user to underst
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:53:19PM -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> > It is the lack of an ABI that is most frustrating to these users.
>
> And the presence of an ABI would be _very_ frustrating to core
> developers. Not only would these people suffer, everyone would --
> developer time would be wast
17 matches
Mail list logo
