Hi,
Thank you for the comments.
>> Why not just use sscanf?
Here's a fixed version of the previous patch, that uses sscanf.
>
> Better yet, use a better interface like netlink rather than module
> parameters.
Wouldn't that be overkill?
best regards,
---
Sig
Hi,
I found this in drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c.
> /* not complete check, but should be good enough to
> catch mistakes */
I made a patch which I believe is little bit better than this,
I hope...
best regards,
---
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Takata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- li