Hi,
Can we solve the problem another way, by not taking refs on the glocks
when we are iterating over them for the debugfs files? I assume that is
the main issue here.
We didn't used to take refs since the rcu locking was enough during the
walk itself. We used to only keep track of the hash
Hi,
On 05/05/17 11:09, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
On (05/05/17 10:45), Steven Whitehouse wrote:
I do wonder if the man page for recvmsg is wrong, or at least a bit
confusing. SOCK_SEQPACKET is stream based not message based - it just
happens to have EOR markers in the stream. There is no reason
Hi,
On 05/05/17 06:18, Sam Kumar wrote:
Hello,
I have recently had occasion to use SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets on Linux,
and noticed some odd behavior. When using sendmsg and recvmsg with
these sockets, it seems that the "end-of-record" flag (MSG_EOR) is not
being propagated correctly.
It depends wh
Hi,
On 12/08/15 17:42, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 12-08-2015 12:33, David Laight escreveu:
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Sent: 12 August 2015 14:16
Em 12-08-2015 07:23, David Laight escreveu:
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Sent: 11 August 2015 23:22
DLM is using 1-to-many API but in a
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 09:13 -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >This commit: ece95f7fefe3afae19e641e1b3f5e64b00d5b948 seems to have
> >caused a problem with parsing bond arguments as now only the numeric
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 09:13 -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >This commit: ece95f7fefe3afae19e641e1b3f5e64b00d5b948 seems to have
> >caused a problem with parsing bond arguments as now only the numeric
>
Hi,
This commit: ece95f7fefe3afae19e641e1b3f5e64b00d5b948 seems to have
caused a problem with parsing bond arguments as now only the numeric
arguments seem to work (in modprobe.conf) and specifying 802.3ad fails.
When I revert that patch in my local tree all seems ok.
Also I notice that one of my
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:11:34PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Hi
>
> The pneigh_lookup/delete silently concerns, that the
> key_len of the table is more that 4 bytes. Look:
>
> u32 hash_val = *(u32 *)(pkey + key_len - 4);
>
> The hash_val for the proxy neighbor entry is four
rr to 0 after the first nlmsg_parse
> and goes on, returning this 0 in any case.
>
> Is this made deliberately, or the patch below is correct?
>
The patch looks good to me.
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Looks good, Feel free to add:
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve.
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 06:36:29PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> sysfs keeps references to module parameters via /sys/module/*/parameters,
> so marking them as __initdata can't wo
>From 657baf6bbaa8302660d6b218149dcb5546b9b08c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:06:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [NET] Change "not found" return value for rule lookup
This changes the "not found" error retu
Hi,
One of the effects of the recent tidy up of the DECnet routing rules
code is that we are no longer able to see the difference between reading
a rule of type FR_ACT_UNREACHABLE returning -ENETUNREACH and simply
running out of rules to look at, which also returns the same thing.
The DECnet code
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 02:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for all the DECnet bits & also the DECnet changes in the other patch I saw
from you relating to the routi
;
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also you should cc Patrick as he is now the maintainer,
Steve.
> ---
> net/decnet/dn_dev.c | 11 +--
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
&
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:49:11PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-11-09 11:46
> >
> > so far as all the DECnet bits go. One question though... will you
> > be adding later (as your slide #5 and #11 from your netconf prese
;
> Moves mark selector code from per protocol part into the generic
> part and adds support for inverting selectors.
>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so far as all the DECnet bits go. One question though... will you
be adding later (as your slide #5 and #11 from yo
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 10:34 +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:32:43AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:31:02AM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > > + opt->opt_optl = dn_htons((__u16)*ptr++);
> >
> > Lose that cas
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 10:32 +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:31:02AM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > + opt->opt_optl = dn_htons((__u16)*ptr++);
>
> Lose that cast; it's only confusing the things...
>
> > + memcpy(opt->op
Hi,
Here is a patch which fixes some endianess problems. Patrick: since you
have both big & little endian machines at your disposal, can you test to
ensure this is ok? Thanks,
Steve.
>From ed3de950e89f8b02302308a2bedd59123ff3b88e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
> >
> > Its not used at the moment[*], but would be required for any kind of flow
> > tracking. The objnum field, could be folded into the objname field I
> > guess on the basis that objnamel == 0 means objname[0] represents the
> > objnum, but that doesn't really buy much.
>
> Well, as I pri
ix for a typo.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Alan Kemmerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index dd0761e..810ab9c 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:53:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:42:17 +0200
>
> > How many people are using DECNET and want to pay the price of this
> > 20 bytes dnports structure ?
>
Point taken :-) Eric, you also need to ad
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:01:03PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > ssize_t tcp_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, int offset,
> > > size_t size, int flags)
> &
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:05:04AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> >
> > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:13:38 +0200
> >
> > > Maybe
y: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks good,
Steve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Here is a fix to the DECnet rules compare function where we used
32bit values rather than 16bit values. Spotted by Patrick McHardy.
Cc: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:22:17PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Here is a fix to Patrick McHardy's increase number of routing tables patch
> > for DECnet. I did just test this and it appears to be working fine with
> > this patch.
&g
Here is a fix to Patrick McHardy's increase number of routing tables patch
for DECnet. I did just test this and it appears to be working fine with
this patch.
Cc: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
[This is also in the DECnet git tree]
As per Stephen Hemminger's recent patch to ipv4/fib_semantics.c this
is the same change but for DECnet.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/decnet/dn_fib.c | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:01:25AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:01:39 +0100
>
> > Is there anything to stop me using RTNLGRP_NOP3 for that? (suitable
> > renamed of course!) So far as I can see
Hi,
With your new protocol independent rules code, I see that there is an
entry in struct fib_rules_ops for a netlink group for notification of
rule changes. For whatever reason (historical I guess) DECnet has never
had a nl group assigned for this, so I'm left with two choices when moving
the cod
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:53:05AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> [DECNET]: Increase number of possible routing tables to 2^32
>
> Increase the nubmer of possible routing tables to 2^32 by replacing the
> fixed sized array of tables by a hash table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAI
Hi,
Here is the updated patch. If you are happy with this, then will you send
it on to Dave, or should I do that?
Steve.
---
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/Documentation/netw
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 07:38:06PM +0100, Robert Olsson wrote:
>
> Steven Whitehouse writes:
>
> > I've been looking into MPLS recently and so one of the first things that
> > would be useful is a testbed to generate test traffic, and hence the
> > attache
nterruptible_sleep_on_timeout() replaced Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* 050103
+ *
+ * MPLS support by Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ *
*/
#include
#include
@@ -154,7 +157,7 @@
#include /* do_div */
#include
-#define VERSION "pktgen v
Hi,
Below is the patch I mentioned at UKUUG, its against an older kernel but
it still applies when I tried it against 2.6.12 just now,
Steve.
-
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru
36 matches
Mail list logo
