ink: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201209060932.212364-2-jianyong...@arm.com
Looks good to me, FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Steven Price
---
arch/arm/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 3 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 3 ++
drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c| 2 ++
drivers/firmware/smccc/Makefil
On 02/02/2021 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
From: Will Deacon
Although the SMCCC specification provides some limited functionality for
describing the presence of hypervisor and firmware services, this is
generally applicable only to functions designated as "Arm Architecture
Service Functions" and
On 22/06/2020 03:25, Jianyong Wu wrote:
Hi Steven,
Hi Jianyong
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
index db6dce3d0e23..366b0646c360 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include
#include
+#
On 19/06/2020 10:30, Jianyong Wu wrote:
ptp_kvm will get this service through smccc call.
The service offers wall time and counter cycle of host for guest.
caller must explicitly determines which cycle of virtual counter or
physical counter to return if it needs counter cycle.
Signed-off-by: Jia
On 25/05/2020 03:11, Jianyong Wu wrote:
Hi Steven,
Hi Jianyong,
[...]>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
index db6dce3d0e23..c964122f8dae 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include
#include
+#incl
On 22/05/2020 09:37, Jianyong Wu wrote:
ptp_kvm modules will get this service through smccc call.
The service offers real time and counter cycle of host for guest.
Also let caller determine which cycle of virtual counter or physical counter
to return.
Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu
---
include/li
