On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:08 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:21:26 + Steven French
> wrote:
> >
> > I applied your patch to the tip of my tree (cifs-2.6.git for-next) -
> > hopefully that makes it easier when I sent the PR in a day or two for
> > cifs/smb
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 10:32 AM James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:10 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > Details can be found here:
> >
> > https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/containers-micro-conference-a
> > t-linux-plumbers-2018/2417
>
> This website was giving a 503 error w
TED]> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:42:09 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:25:00PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > Not seeing any objections to your revised approach (to not allowing
> > signals for cifsd kern
> TCP_NODELAY does not control ACK generation, instead it modifies
> the Nagle algorithm behavior when sending data packets.
Looks like RHEL4 had an odd default smb.conf on the server side - the
RedHat smb.conf seems to set SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF to 8K (reducing
them from their default). This se
