Re: [v2] vhost: add vsock compat ioctl

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:30 PM, David Miller wrote: >> Although the top level ioctls are probably size and layout compatible, >> I do not think that the deeper ioctls can be called by compat binaries >> without some translations in order

Re: [v2] vhost: add vsock compat ioctl

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:30 PM, David Miller wrote: > > Although the top level ioctls are probably size and layout compatible, > I do not think that the deeper ioctls can be called by compat binaries > without some translations in order for them to work. Ok, thanks -- I have only tested VHOST_V

[PATCH v2] vhost: add vsock compat ioctl

This will allow usage of vsock from 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit kernel. Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index 0d14e2ff19f16..ee0c385d9fe54 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost

Re: [PATCH] vhost: add vsock compat ioctl

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0700, Sonny Rao wrote: >> This will allow usage of vsock from 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit >> kernel. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao > > I think you need to co

[PATCH] vhost: add vsock compat ioctl

This will allow usage of vsock from 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit kernel. Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index 0d14e2ff19f16..d0e65e92110e5 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c

[PATCH] vhost: fix vhost ioctl signature to build with clang

78 to 18446744072636378898) [-Werror, -Wswitch] case VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE: 3221794578 is 0xC008AF12 in hex 18446744072636378898 is 0xC008AF12 in hex Fix this by using unsigned ints in the function signature for vhost_vring_ioctl(). Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao --- drivers/vhost/vh