in its ndo_stop() function, they never get disabled if the
> device is destroyed before it's upped.
>
> To reproduce:
> $ while :; do ip l add br0 type bridge hello_time 100; brctl stp br0 on;
> ip l del br0; done;
>
> CC: Xin Long
> CC: Ivan Vecera
> CC: Sebas
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xin Long wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Sebastian Ott
> wrote:
> > [...]
> I couldn't see any bridge-related thing here, and it couldn't be reproduced
> with virbr0 (stp=1) on my box (on both s390x and x86_64), I guess there
> i
Hi,
A system running v4.12-rc3-11-gf511c0b on s390 hangs after boot with no
messages on the console. The message buffer obtained via a system dump
looked like this:
[...]
[ 17.870712] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
[ 19.618523] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in
Hi,
I ran into the following lockdep complaint:
[7.059561] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[7.059566] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[7.059570] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[7.059579] CPU: 6 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted
4.9.0-0
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Tariq Toukan
>
> Add new type of struct mlx5_frag_buf which is used to allocate fragmented
> buffers rather than contiguous, and make the Completion Queues (CQs) use
> it as they are big (default of 2MB per CQ in Striding RQ).
>
> This fixe
Hi,
Ifup on an interface provided by CX4 (MLX5 driver) on s390 fails with:
[ 22.318553] [ cut here ]
[ 22.318564] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 399 at mm/page_alloc.c:3421
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2ee/0x1298
[ 22.318568] Modules linked in: mlx4_ib ib_core mlx5_core mlx4_en m
Hi,
After a userspace update (fedora 23->24) I reproducibly run into the
following oops during shutdown (on s390):
[ 71.054832] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel
address space
[ 71.054835] Failing address: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6000 TEID: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6803
[ 71.054838] Fau
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 14/09/2016 4:53 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > > On 14/09/2016 2:09 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > > If an error occurs in mlx4_init_eq_table the index used in the
> > &g
Hello Tariq,
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 14/09/2016 2:09 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > If an error occurs in mlx4_init_eq_table the index used in the
> > err_out_unmap label is one too big which results in a panic in
> > mlx4_free_eq. This patch fixes the in
If an error occurs in mlx4_init_eq_table the index used in the
err_out_unmap label is one too big which results in a panic in
mlx4_free_eq. This patch fixes the index in the error path.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
Hi,
I receive tons of these csum failure warnings. The patch mentioned here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/512005/
seems to work. Will something like that be integrated upstream?
Sebastian
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/30/2015 5:17 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > On 6/30/2015 4:24 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > > > > Do you run the VF on the same system/kernel as the PF, or the VF is
> &
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Sebastian Ott
> wrote:
> > OK, using this patch it worked:
>
> yep, I forgot to recap err to zero.
>
> By "it worked" you mean the VF is live and kicking, all functionality
> you ha
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On 6/30/2015 5:17 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > > On 6/30/2015 4:24 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > > > > > Do you
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/30/2015 5:17 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > On 6/30/2015 4:24 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > > > > Do you run the VF on the same system/kernel as the PF, or the VF is
> &
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/30/2015 4:24 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > >Do you run the VF on the same system/kernel as the PF, or the VF is
> > > >probed to
> > > >VM which runs the latest kernel and the PF runsolder kernel (which?)
>
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/30/2015 1:45 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > [ 88.909558] mlx4_slave_cmd op=3840, ret=-22, status=3
> > [ 88.909562] mlx4_core :00:00.0: mlx4_allocate_default_counters:
> > failed to allocate default counter port 1 err
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sebastian Ott
> wrote:
> > after the latest mellanox update the mlx4 driver fails to probe a VF:
> > [ 88.909562] mlx4_core :00:00.0: mlx4_allocate_default_counters:
> > failed to allocate de
Hello,
after the latest mellanox update the mlx4 driver fails to probe a VF:
[ 88.909562] mlx4_core :00:00.0: mlx4_allocate_default_counters: failed
to allocate default counter port 1 err -22
[ 88.909564] mlx4_core :00:00.0: Failed to allocate default counters,
aborting
[ 88.961735
19 matches
Mail list logo