Re: eth1 became eth2, but dmesg still says eth1

2007-05-06 Thread Ryan Richter
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 09:19:40AM -0700, Emil S Tantilov wrote: > >However the bond0 interface failed to come up, complaining that there > >was no such interface as eth1. I checked /proc/net/dev, and it listed > >eth0 and _eth2_. I changed the bonding configuration to use eth0 and > >eth2 and it

eth1 became eth2, but dmesg still says eth1

2007-05-05 Thread Ryan Richter
Upon upgrading from 2.6.20.7 to 2.6.20.11, e1000 seems to be confused about what the second ethernet interface is called. Here's what dmesg says: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.15-k2 Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation. ACPI: PCI Interrupt :04:00.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level,