On 1/8/19 12:14 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:08 AM Piotr Sawicki
> wrote:
>
>> Yes I know. It looks like the Smack's security rule was changed during this
>> process.
>>
>> Firstly the packet was allowed to be received and it was put
On 1/8/19 11:48 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:36 AM Piotr Sawicki
> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/8/19 11:06 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:47 AM Piotr Sawicki
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 1/8/19 10:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wr
On 1/8/19 11:06 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:47 AM Piotr Sawicki
> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/8/19 10:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:57 AM Piotr Sawicki
>>> wrote:
>>>> dccp_v6_rcv() calls _
On 1/8/19 10:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:57 AM Piotr Sawicki
> wrote:
>> dccp_v6_rcv() calls __sk_receive_skb() which calls sk_filter_trim_cap().
>>
>> sk_filter_trim_cap() should return a value not equal to 0 and cause the skb
>> to
instead of infering it.
>
> Fixes: d66a8acbda92 ("Smack: Inform peer that IPv6 traffic has been blocked")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
> Cc: Piotr Sawicki
> Cc: Casey Schaufler
> Reported-by: syzbot
> ---
> net/ipv6/icmp.c |
