kb->data[1] << 0) & 0x0FF);
if (frametype == ROSE_CALL_REQUEST &&
Reported-by:syzbot+1a2c456a1ea08fa5b...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux, f6bvp
ROSE driver nor application.
I will try your new patch version 2 and report any possible change.
Regards,
Bernard Pidoux,
F6BVP
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:44:50PM +0100, Bernard Pidoux F6BVP wrote:
Hi,
With AX25 patches applied I still get this possible circular
Hi,
With AX25 patches applied I still get this possible circular locking
message.
Regards,
Bernard P.
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.24 #3
---
swapper/
Hi,
This patch is send to replace preceding commit :
From fd66cc115e058b2fc63a0e26aa73f1d27113105a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:10:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [ROSE] new rose_get_route() function
I removed unnecessary li
to reexamine my code.
Regards,
Bernard P.
Bernard Pidoux wrote:
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Bernard Pidoux a écrit :
From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Bernard Pidoux a écrit :
From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] template declaration for rose_get_route()
Signed-off-by: B
From 5c50971c6088f380eafdb1a6a7de5a5d3686c8c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:19:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] [ROSE] ENETUNREACH held rose_connect()
Initial connection to rose neighbour nodes was unusually,
t0 timer was block
From bc108e5ee0b0353c3707df25e12e40038da0160a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:23:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] [ROSE] return with lock held
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL
From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] template declaration for rose_get_route()
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
includ
2001
From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:10:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [ROSE] new rose_get_route() function
rose_get_neigh() was called by two different functions.
Firstly, by rose_connect() in order to establish connections to
adjacent rose nodes. This
pful and probably safe for after killing kissattach
we don't want to use attached ax25 devices.
Regards,
Bernard Pidoux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/net/rose.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/rose.h b/include/net/rose.h
index d3ab453..0cfdc0e 100644
--- a/include/net/rose.h
+++ b/include/net/rose.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
Jarek Poplawski wrote :
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Bernard Pidoux F6BVP wrote:
Hi,
When I killall kissattach I can see the following message.
This happens on kernel 2.6.24-rc5 already patched with the 6 previously
patches I sent recently
Eric,
I applied your patch and now I have all /proc/sys/net/ax25
created and initialized as before.
Thanks.
Bernard Pidoux
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
With 2.6.24-rc5 there is no /proc/net/ax25
/proc/sys/net/ax25?
Here is an extract from
/0xa7
do_exit+0x205/0x674
error_code+0x6a/0x70
sys_exit_group+0x0/0xd
sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x9a
==
Bernard Pidoux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
ep+0x49/0x59
[] work_notifysig+0x13/0x26
===
Bernard Pidoux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
/ax25/ax0/connect_mode .3.9.1.4 Unknown
sysctl binary path
(...)
===
sysctl table check failed: /net/ax25/ax0/standard_window_size .3.9.1.5
Unknown sysctl binary path
===
(...)
and so on ...
Bernard Pidoux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from
size, which
in turn induced significant results on the AX25 frame fragmentation and
removed some garbage trailing characters in AX25 frames sent.
signed off by Bernard Pidoux, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.24-rc5/net/rose/rose_link.c 2007-12-11 04:48:43.0
+0100
+++ b/net/rose
Pidoux, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.24-rc5/net/rose/af_rose.c 2007-12-11 04:48:43.0 +0100
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c2007-12-14 14:09:40.0 +0100
@@ -782,7 +782,6 @@
rose_insert_socket(sk); /* Finish the bind */
}
-rose_try_next_neigh
Hi,
ROSE_PACLEN was defined by a substraction using a fixed constant value
of 256 in af_rose.c
#define ROSE_PACLEN (256-ROSE_MIN_LEN)
For more convenience 256 is replaced by AX25_DEF_PACLEN default size
declared in ax25.h which is the actual AX25 MTU.
signed off by Bernard Pidoux, [EMAIL
This patch corrects the declaration of struct proto_ops as static const
like in struct socket
signed off by Bernard Pidoux, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.24-rc5/net/rose/af_rose.c 2007-12-11 04:48:43.0 +0100
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c2007-12-14 14:32:06.0 +0100
@@ -63,7
not performed on the whole node list.
A new function __rose_get_neigh() is introduced to cure a spin lock
conflict related to rose_node_list_lock.
signed off by Alexey Dobriyan,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signed off by Bernard Pidoux, f6bvp @ amsat.org
--- linux-2.6.24-rc5/include/net/rose.h 2007-12-11 04
Hi,
This patch cancels a circular locking conflict that appeared with a
timeout of an AX25 connection.
signed off by Jarek Poplawski
--- linux-2.6.24-rc5/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c 2007-12-11 04:48:43.0
+0100
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c 2007-12-14 14:30:02.0 +0100
@@ -279,
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
Bernard Pidoux wrote, On 12/02/2007 06:37 PM:
Hi,
Many thanks for your patch for ~/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
Introduction of local_bh_disable() ... local_bh_enable()
cured the inconsistent lock state related to AX25 connect timeout.
I have now a stable monoprocessor
st regards,
Bernard Pidoux
F6BVP
rose-patch-2.6.23.9.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar
is the inconsistent lock state could be
observed with ax25_call, flexd, fpac ax25 application programms.
Please find attached a few reports captured from dmesg after each event.
Could someone look at the listing and identify the origin of the problem
,if unique ?
Thanks.
Bernard Pidoux
Ralf Baechle wrote :
Convert all NET/ROM sysctl time values from jiffies to ms as units.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With such extensive patches for netrom and rose modules that will go
into a future 2.6.x kernel, I think it would be justified to update the
following ba
Ralf Baechle wrote :
Index: linux-net.git/net/rose/af_rose.c
===
--- linux-net.git.orig/net/rose/af_rose.c 2006-04-29 01:54:21.0
+0100
+++ linux-net.git/net/rose/af_rose.c2006-04-29 11:37:34.0 +0100
Whi
Ralf Baechle wrote:
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the called needs to
hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in
rose_neigh_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All ROSE and HZ patches applied to kernel 2.6.16
Many thanks Ralf
Hi,
I would like to report that when compiling 2.6.15.4 kernel
there is an error with undefined symbol 'has_bridge_parent'
in compilation of bridge/br_netfilter.c
due to CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG 1 option.
Regards,
Bernard Pidoux
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
30 matches
Mail list logo
