On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:52 -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> >
> > I don't think that's really right either. For one thing, things like
> > DHCP's timeout start counting at about the same time as "ifcon
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:08 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> But is it really needed? Imagine the situation when computer is started
> with unplugged ethernet cable which is plugged in later. I know, this is
> rare, but - shouldn't be the right approach that DHCP is started by
> hotplug when the carrier
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 14:39 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> I don't agree with this scheme. Association should be started on
> explicit userspace request (*). As we definitely don't want to add a new
> WE (or some other) call to perform this, the only call we can use for
> telling the driver "ok, now it
