Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] wimax: fix duplicate initializer warning

2020-10-27 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> From: Arnd Bergmann > > Makes sense. I checked > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WiMAX_networks, and it appears > that these entries are all stale, after everyone has migrated to LTE > or discontinued their service altogether. > > NetworkManager appears to have dropped userspace support

RE: locking in wimax/i2400m

2018-06-11 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
Hello Sebastian Thanks for checking this out, SA> I tried to figure out if the URB-completion handler uses any SA> locking and stumbled here. SA> i2400m_pm_notifier() is called from process context. This SA> function invokes i2400m_fw_cache() + i2400m_fw_uncache(). Both SA> f

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:39, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 17:12 +0000, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +0000, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >>>>> ping any comments on this? >>>> >>>> None fr

RE: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
>On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +0000, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >> > ping any comments on this? >> >> None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't >> validate if the change would work or not. > I still have a 5350 around somewhere, I

RE: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-24 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> ping > any comments on this? None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't validate if the change would work or not.