either, it just doesn't say either way. ^_^)
In fact, given that it's a BE firmware update for Intel-based Macs' bcm
cards, I presume the endianess of the firmware doesn't matter?
--
Paul Hampson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
Michael Buesch bu3sch.de> writes:
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 23:23, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > I've been backporting the bcm43xx-d80211 driver to whatever the released
> > 2.6 kernel was using the rt2x00 project's d80211 stack (equivalent to
> > current wire
Ivo Van Doorn gmail.com> writes:
> > I've been backporting the bcm43xx-d80211 driver to whatever the released
> > using the rt2x00 project's d80211 stack
> Just a note about that stack, it should only be used on kernel 2.6.17
> and higher.
Thanks, I've noted that at the berlios wiki.
--
Paul "T
Hi,
Long time lurker, first time poster. ^_^
I've been backporting the bcm43xx-d80211 driver to whatever the released
2.6 kernel was using the rt2x00 project's d80211 stack (equivalent to
current wireless-dev but with a workaround for not having a ieee80211_dev
pointer and still using the _tfm i
