Hi Lijun,
Lijun Pan writes:
> When the linux system is under stress or the VIOS server is
> responding slowly, the vnic driver may hit multiple timeouts during the
> reset process. Instead of queueing the reset requests to system_wq,
> queueing the relatively slow reset job to the system_long_wq.
Doug Maxey wrote:
>
> A small set of fixups for checkpatch.
>
> Based on upstream pull from a few hours ago.
Er, ehea doesn't even build right now[1], maybe that could get fixed
first? :-)
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/28/337
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netde
Hi-
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> +static inline long ehea_hcall_9arg_9ret(unsigned long opcode,
> + unsigned long arg1,
> + unsigned long arg2,
> + unsigned long arg3,
> +
Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Hope all the callers of this function are in non-atomic context (but I
> wasn't able to find any callers?).
Never mind, I somehow missed the users of ehea_hcall_9arg_9ret in this
patch, sorry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe net
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Chris Leech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > + for_each_cpu(i)
>
> That's about to be deleted. Please use for_each_possible_cpu().
>
> That's if for_each_possible_cpu() is appropriate.
It is -- those loops traverse chan->local, which is alloc_percpu'd,
which allocates