Re: [RFC 0/4] NetLabel

2006-05-26 Thread Mikel L. Matthews
Same issue, I would drop them. Paul Moore wrote: Mikel L. Matthews wrote: Paul Moore wrote: James Morris wrote: Outgoing fragment *should* be labeled correctly assuming the Linux base network stack does the right thing (I haven't tested this yet). The issue we are discussing he

Re: [RFC 0/4] NetLabel

2006-05-26 Thread Mikel L. Matthews
an you explain how module loading and module refcounting for these modules work? (e.g. what causes netlabel_cipso_v4 to be loaded, is it always safe to unload if the refcount is zero?) -- Thanks, Mike Mikel L. Matthews Chief Technology Officer Innovative Security Systems, Inc. (dba Argus Systems