On 3/11/21 7:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09:12PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> From: Mark Bloch
>>
>> Now that a pointer to the managing E-Switch is stored in the representor
>> use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch
>&g
On 10/2/2020 10:05, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 16:24 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:52:39 -0700 sa...@kernel.org wrote:
>>> - for (; i >= 0; i--) {
>>> + for (--i; i >= 0; i--) {
>>
>> while (i--)
>
> while(--i)
It has to be: while (i--)
Case of i
On 5/8/2020 12:58, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:30:09AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> +flow_act->action &=
>> +~MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_NEXT_PRIO;
>> +flow_act->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST;
>> +handle = _mlx5_add_flow_rules(f
On 6/19/19 1:12 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 07:58:51AM +0000, Mark Bloch wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/19/2019 00:43, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 07:26:54AM +, Mark Bloch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
On 6/19/2019 00:43, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 07:26:54AM +0000, Mark Bloch wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/18/2019 23:51, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 06:40:16AM +, Jianbo Liu wrote:
>>>> The 06/19/2019 13:04, L
match on the metadata, instead of source port.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed
>>>>>> --
On 5/17/2019 20:17, wenxu wrote:
>
> 在 2019/5/18 6:11, Mark Bloch 写道:
>>
>> On 5/17/19 2:17 AM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
>>> From: wenxu
>>>
>>> The mlx5e support the lag mode. When add mlx_p0 and mlx_p1 to bond0.
>>> packet received from mlx
On 5/17/19 2:17 AM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu
>
> The mlx5e support the lag mode. When add mlx_p0 and mlx_p1 to bond0.
> packet received from mlx_p0 or mlx_p1 and in the ingress tc flower
> forward to vf0. The tc rule can't be offloaded because there is
> no indr_register_block for t
.org; linux-
>> r...@vger.kernel.org; Maor Gottlieb ; Mark Bloch
>>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 mlx5-next 09/11] net/mlx5: Eswitch, enable RoCE
>> loopback traffic
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:14:16PM +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>>> From: Maor Gottlie
On 7/30/2018 10:10 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 03:58:38PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> From: Leon Romanovsky
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is PATCH variant of RFC posted in previous week to the ML.
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/944184/
>>
>> Changelog:
>> RFC -> v0:
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Or Gerlitz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 5:47 AM
> To: Mark Bloch
> Cc: Doug Ledford ; Jason Gunthorpe
> ; Leon Romanovsky ; RDMA
> maili
> -Original Message-
> From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:gerlitz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 2:33 PM
> To: Mark Bloch
> Cc: Doug Ledford ; Jason Gunthorpe
> ; Leon Romanovsky ; RDMA
> mailing list ; Saeed Mahameed
> ; linux-netdev
> Subject: Re: [RFC
> -Original Message-
> From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:gerlitz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 2:24 PM
> To: Mark Bloch
> Cc: Doug Ledford ; Jason Gunthorpe
> ; Leon Romanovsky ; RDMA
> mailing list ; Saeed Mahameed
> ; linux-netdev
> Subject: Re: [RFC
On 04/03/2018 15:26, Paul Blakey wrote:
> When inserting duplicate objects (those with the same key),
> current rhlist implementation messes up the chain pointers by
> updating the bucket pointer instead of prev next pointer to the
> newly inserted node. This causes missing elements on removal an
On 20/12/2017 19:58, David Miller wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:33:36 -0800
>
>> +static int esw_offloads_load_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int nvports)
>> +{
>> +u8 rep_type = 0;
>> +int err;
>> +
>> +while (rep_type < NUM_REP_TYPES) {
>> +
On 20/12/2017 19:57, David Miller wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:33:30 -0800
>
>> +int esw_offloads_init_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
>> +{
>> +struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = esw->dev;
>> +struct mlx5_esw_offload *offloads;
>> +struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
When stopping the vxlan interface we detach it from the socket.
Use RCU_INIT_POINTER() and not rcu_assign_pointer() to do so.
Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net
from vxlan_stop() to match the call from vxlan_open().
Fixes: 56ef9c909b40 ("vxlan: Move socket initialization to within rtnl scope")
Acked-by: Jiri Benc
Tested-by: Roi Dayan
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch
---
V2: Added a Fixes tag.
Added Acked-by and Tested-by from Jiri and Roi.
driv
from vxlan_stop() to match the call from vxlan_open().
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 19 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 328b471..f6a4310 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
Hi Roopa,
On 29/05/2017 05:50, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Mark Bloch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting a KASAN (use after free) error when doing:
>>
>> ip link add vxlan1 type vxlan external
>> ip link set vxlan1 up
>
Hi,
I'm getting a KASAN (use after free) error when doing:
ip link add vxlan1 type vxlan external
ip link set vxlan1 up
ip link set vxlan1 down
ip link del vxlan1
[ 600.495331]
==
[ 600.509678] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vxlan
On 12/09/2016 19:07, Ram Amrani wrote:
> Allocate and setup RoCE resources, interrupts and completion queues.
> Adds device attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Borundia
> Signed-off-by: Ram Amrani
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c | 408 +++-
> drivers/infiniban
Hi Ram,
Just a few thoughts
On 12/09/2016 19:07, Ram Amrani wrote:
> Adds a skeletal implementation of the qed* RoCE driver -
> basically the ability to communicate with the qede driver and
> receive notifications from it regarding various init/exit events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Borundia
23 matches
Mail list logo
