Re: Fw: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
e hints, does this patch make the problem go away? I guess now that hw checksumming is identified as the direct cause, this is no longer neecssary? If yes, just tell me and I'll try it out. -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-

Re: Fw: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
device somehow changes the ppp packets, but nevertheless). If I can be of further assistance in tracking down this problem, please rely on me. I can easily live with hw checksumming switched off on that if, though. -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ --

Re: Fw: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
ink I get more than a single message for every physical packet received). -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --==---/ / _ \/ // /\

Re: Fw: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
e if it is a new > problem? I hope that trying with 2.6.11, and getting the same problem (as I did in the meantime), is even better than testing 2.6.12.5. > So far I don't think its related to routed. The weird thing is that it works on tap, but not on ethernet/

Re: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:29:30 +0200 > From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64 > > > Hi! > > I recently upgraded a 32 bit machine to a new amd64 board+cpu