On 4/15/06 5:32 PM, "Adrian Bunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:13:14AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
>
>> actually, can we hold off on this change? the RPC transport switch will
>> eventually need most of those EXPORT_SYMBOLs.
>>
> On Wednesday November 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:31:14AM -0800, Lever, Charles wrote:
> > > so i don't remember why you are removing
> xdr_decode_string. are we sure
> > > that no-one will need this functionality in the
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:13:14AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
>
> > actually, can we hold off on this change? the RPC
> transport switch will
> > eventually need most of those EXPORT_SYMBOLs.
>
> Am I right to assume this will happen in the foreseeable future
