On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:52 +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> According to commit 640916db2bf7 ("can: c_can: Make it SMP safe") let RX use
> IF1 (i.e. IF_RX) and TX use IF2 (i.e. IF_TX).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
> drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 2 +-
>
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:54 +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:54 +0100
> From: Dario Binacchi
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Federico Vaga , Alexander Stein
> , Dario Binacchi
> , "David S. Miller" , Jakub
> Kicinski , Marc Kleine-Budde , Oliver
> Hartkop
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:33:45 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/22/20 12:29 PM, yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > From: Yegor Yefremov
> >
> > Use table markup to show the PGN structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov
> > ---
> > Documentation/networking/j1939.rst | 12
On ma, 22 jun 2020 14:54:15 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/22/20 2:43 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > I get RX-0: FIFO overflows in listen-only mode (back-to-back burst of
> > the single other node).
>
> Single other node? Who's ACKing the CAN frames?
he
arded against load.
Kurt
On ma, 22 jun 2020 14:30:31 +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>
> On ma, 22 jun 2020 12:55:41 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 6/22/20 12:25 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > > I got my board up with a 5.7, despite device-tree problems completely
> >
vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN driver
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/68.9.0
>
> On 6/22/20 12:25 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > I got my board up with a 5.7, despite device-tree problems comp
Hey Marc,
On do, 18 jun 2020 14:35:28 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/18/20 2:30 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > On do, 18 jun 2020 00:36:29 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 6/17/20 6:59 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> >>> I'm in the process of gettin
On do, 18 jun 2020 00:36:29 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/17/20 6:59 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > I'm in the process of getting a Variscite imx8m mini SOM online, with
>
> Have your heard about the imx8m plus? It has CAN cores! We have a board in the
&
On do, 11 jun 2020 18:26:19 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> > Controller with MCP2517FD as the target controller version. This series is
> > mostly inspir
> Hi Kurt,
>
> On 07/28/2017 09:41 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>
> >>The transceiver is an analog device that needs to support faster
> >>switching frequency (FETs) including minimizing delay to support CAN-FD
> >>ie higher bitrate. From the transceiver pe
>
> On 07/28/2017 01:33 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > Hi Kurt,
> >
> > On 07/28/2017 03:02 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> >
> >>>> The word 'max-arbitration-bitrate' makes the difference very clear.
> >>>
> >>> I thi
>
> On 07/28/2017 06:57 AM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>
> >So while _a_ transceiver may be spec'd to 1MBit during arbitration,
> >CAN FD packets may IMHO exceed that speed during data phase.
>
> When the bitrate is limited to 1Mbit/s you are ONLY allowed to use 1
>
> On 07/27/2017 01:47 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > On 07/26/2017 08:29 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> I'm fine with switching to using bitrate instead of speed. Kurk was
> >> originally the one that suggested to use the term arbitration and data
> >> since thats how the spec r
looks way more clear to me.
That's my opinion.
The important things, like the contents of the functions, look good.
Kind regards,
Kurt Van Dijck
> On 06/29/2017 05:36 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> mcan@0 {
> >>>> ...
> >>>> fixed-transceiver {
> >>>>max-canfd-speed = <2000>
> >>>> };
> >>>> ...
> >&g
> >>
> >> mcan@0 {
> >>...
> >>fixed-transceiver {
> >> max-canfd-speed = <2000>
> >>};
> >>...
> >> };
Since when would a transceiver support different speeds for CAN & CANFD?
No transceivers were available, but they are now.
I see no datalink problem applying 2MBit for r
--- Original message ---
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:28:39 +0200
> From: Wolfgang Grandegger
>
[...]
> >>>+
> >>>+ if (!(cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)) {
> >>>+ writel(data[0], &cf_buf->data[0]);
> >>>+ writel(data[1], &cf_buf->data[1]);
> >>
> >>Why do you not check cf->can_dlc h
17 matches
Mail list logo
