Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-21 Thread Krzysztof Matusik
Dnia środa, 21 czerwca 2006 14:54, Patrick McHardy napisał: > > I'd love to see this one implemented. I'm using HFSC more than a year and > > it never provides proper QoS on ATM/ADSL links; low delays can never be > > achieved even with significant throttling below the h/w link bandwidth. > > Mhh .

Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-21 Thread Krzysztof Matusik
Dnia wtorek, 20 czerwca 2006 17:16, Patrick McHardy napisał: > jamal wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-20-06 at 03:04 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>It would be nice to have support for HFSC as well, which unfortunately > >>needs to be done in the kernel since it doesn't use rate tables. > >>What about qd