RE: What was the reason for 2.6.22 SMP kernels to change how sendmsg is called?

Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Evgeniy Polyakov Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 00:33 To: Kevin Wilson Cc: David Miller; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What was the reason for 2.6.22 SMP kernels to change how sendmsg is called?

RE: What was the reason for 2.6.22 SMP kernels to change how sendmsg is called?

er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 15:18 To: Kevin Wilson Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What was the reason for 2.6.22 SMP kernels to change how sendmsg is called? From: "Kevin Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:54:31 -0600

What was the reason for 2.6.22 SMP kernels to change how sendmsg is called?

Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Wilson Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 16:51 To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: sk_prot->sendmsg(...) giving me a kernel oops on kernels past 2.6.20 I've searched everywhere (including this list) for a

sk_prot->sendmsg(...) giving me a kernel oops on kernels past 2.6.20

I've searched everywhere (including this list) for a report but couldn't find anything that can tell me what implementation step(s) I am missing. Essentially all the kernels past 2.6.20 gives me a kernel oops on the sendmsg code. I know the sk_buff changes worked things over quite a bit but I have