Re: Network virtualization/isolation

2006-12-02 Thread Kari Hurtta
Kari Hurtta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes in gmane.linux.network: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes in gmane.linux.network: > > > Ok. So on this point we agree. Full isolation at the network device/L2 > > level > > is desirable and no one is oppo

Re: Network virtualization/isolation

2006-12-02 Thread Kari Hurtta
inside of network device namespaces is loopback device. - Connection inside of network socket namespaces is socket using loopback address(es)? / Kari Hurtta - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Routing tables (Re: [patch 2/6] [Network namespace] Network device sharing by view)

2006-07-06 Thread Kari Hurtta
| | | | green routing deamon (ospf) | | | + + | +- green0 -- green1 --+ I I That may allow running different routing deamon on red and

Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction

2006-06-10 Thread Kari Hurtta
back is isolated inside the container and it is not > possible to communicate between containers via the > loopback. > >- several containers can have an application bind to the same > address:port without conflicting. That of course be problem, if initially unshared nam