Hi
Just Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's good, but it may (and probably will) suppress many other messages
which may be of more interest...
That's the crux of the matter. There is no way we can satisfy everyone
short of putting a knob on each individual prin
Hi
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:49:05PM +0100, Just Marc wrote:
You're right, actually this box serves http/ftp file transfers only,
it's a mirror with a large amount of downloads a day.
That's interesting. The RX bug that I fixed earlier would usually
manifest itsel
Hi
Herbert Xu wrote:
BTW, this message is already under net_ratelimit so I don't see any
urgency in getting rid of it completely. If we're going down the
path of disabling it, we probably should go for something more global
rather than a sysctl that controls this one message.
Already
Hi,
Just Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're now at 2.6.16.12 and it is still showing thousands of times a day
on a busy web server, have all the bugs been discovered yet?
There are no known bugs on the RX side in 2.6.16 that would cause this.
The few busy web servers
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:02:43 +0200
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 18:19, Just Marc wrote:
I thought that maybe it's time to either set TCP_DEBUG to 0 or
alternatively allow an admin to toggle the printing of this message
off/on? On a f
Herbert Xu wrote:
Just Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at mailing list archives there has been much talk of this print
in the past, given the fact that this check/print is surrounded by an
A good number of these turned out to be a bug in the Linux TCP stack.
If this m
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 18:19, Just Marc wrote:
I thought that maybe it's time to either set TCP_DEBUG to 0 or
alternatively allow an admin to toggle the printing of this message
off/on? On a few busy web servers running usually latest versions of
2.6 I have this me
Hi everyone,
Looking at mailing list archives there has been much talk of this print
in the past, given the fact that this check/print is surrounded by an
#ifdef TCP_DEBUG
#ifdef TCP_DEBUG
if (net_ratelimit()) {
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
printk(KERN_DEBUG
