Re: Re: [RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram

2021-04-13 Thread Jiang Wang .
wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:12:50PM +, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > > > >On 12 Apr 2021, at 20:53, Jiang Wang . > >mailto:jiang.w...@bytedance.com>> wrote: > > > >On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:04 AM Stefano Garzarella > >mailto:sga

Re: [RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram

2021-04-13 Thread Jiang Wang .
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:02 AM Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > > > On 7 Apr 2021, at 20:25, Jiang Wang . wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:51 AM Jorgen Hansen wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 6 Apr 2021, at 20:31, Jiang Wang wrote: > &g

Re: Re: [RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram

2021-04-12 Thread Jiang Wang .
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:04 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Jiang, > thanks for re-starting the multi-transport support for dgram! No problem. > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:25:36AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:51 AM Jorgen Hansen wrote: > &g

Re: [External] Re: [RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram

2021-04-07 Thread Jiang Wang .
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:51 AM Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > > On 6 Apr 2021, at 20:31, Jiang Wang wrote: > > > > From: "jiang.wang" > > > > Currently, only VMCI supports dgram sockets. To supported > > nested VM use case, this patch re

[RFC] vsock: add multiple transports support for dgram

2021-04-06 Thread Jiang Wang
s. Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang --- This patch is not tested. I don't have a VMWare testing environment. Could someone help me to test it? include/net/af_vsock.h | 2 -- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 63 +- net/vmw_vsock/vmci_t

Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/14] bpf: Support calling kernel function

2021-03-30 Thread Jiang Wang .
Hi Martin, I am working with Cong to get Clang/LLVM-13 to test. But I am confused whether CLANG/LLVM-13 is released or not. >From https://apt.llvm.org/ , I saw llvm-13 was released in Feb, but it does not have the diff you mentioned. >From the following links, I am not sure if LLVM-13 was really