Re: [PATCH v1 net] TCP_USER_TIMEOUT and tcp_keepalive should conform to RFC5482

2017-08-10 Thread Jerry Chu
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Rao Shoaib wrote: > > > On 08/09/2017 09:59 PM, Jerry Chu wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Jerry Chu wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Rao Shoaib wrote: >>>> >>>> >>

Re: [PATCH v1 net] TCP_USER_TIMEOUT and tcp_keepalive should conform to RFC5482

2017-08-09 Thread Jerry Chu
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Jerry Chu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Rao Shoaib wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2017 05:30 PM, David Miller wrote: >>> >>> From: Joe Smith >>> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:20:32 -0700 >>> >>&g

Re: [PATCH v1 net] TCP_USER_TIMEOUT and tcp_keepalive should conform to RFC5482

2017-08-09 Thread Jerry Chu
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Rao Shoaib wrote: > > > On 08/09/2017 05:30 PM, David Miller wrote: >> >> From: Joe Smith >> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:20:32 -0700 >> >>> Making Linux conform to standards and behavior that is logical seems >>> like a good enough reason. >> >> That's an awesome atti

Re: [PATCH v1 net] TCP_USER_TIMEOUT and tcp_keepalive should conform to RFC5482

2017-08-09 Thread Jerry Chu
ter TCP_USER_TIMEOUT milliseconds of inactivity. > ccing the original author Jerry Chu who can tell more. > There was a reason for the above otherwise I wouldn't have explicitly spelled it out in my commit msg. But unfortunately it was seven years ago and I can't remember why. It coul

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP - part I

2016-06-21 Thread Jerry Chu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:29 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Tom Herbert > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:13:48 -0700 > >> Routing around the problem is already being done. > > QUIC, a new protocol used for specific purposes and implemented in > userspace from the start is significantly different from