Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
On 11/9/06, Jeffrey V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case I am referring to, the memory is already mapped with a
previous call, which means it may be getting
mapped twice.
I guess maybe I'm not keeping up with you. Thi
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
On 11/9/06, Jeffrey V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case I am referring to, the memory is already mapped with a
previous call, which means it may be getting
mapped twice.
I guess maybe I'm not keeping up with you. This is what I see looking
in 2.6.18, i
Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:14:56PM -0700, Jeffrey V. Merkey wrote:
Yes, we need one. The adapter needs to maintain these stats from the
registers in the kernel structure and not
its own local variables.
Did you read the code to see what the adapter does with thes
Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:39:28PM -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Please review, sign-off/ack, and forward upstream.
--linas
Per feedback, here's a slightly more human-readable version.
--linas
[PATCH]: e1000: prevent statistics from getting garbled during reset.
Awesome. Now all we need is someone to write the bcm series for wireless
and ndiswrapper
can go away.
Jeff
James Ketrenos wrote:
Intel is pleased to announce the launch of an open source project to
support the Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection mini-PCI
express adapter (IPW3945).
Al Boldi wrote:
The current ip / ifconfig configuration is arcane and inflexible. The reason
being, that they are based on design principles inherited from the last
century.
In a GNU/OpenSource environment, OpenMinds should not inhibit themselves
achieving new design-goals to enable a flexi
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
this should be on netdev.
On 11/22/05, Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have noted that the e1000 driver is now supporting DMA splitting of
the packet header and payload into separate pages. I also noticed
that none of the config options enable i
