Re: [PATCH] compiler-clang: remove version check for BPF Tracing

2020-11-06 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:52:50AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:16 PM Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > I can take it through the bpf tree if no one objects. > > Doesn't matter to me. You'll need to coordinate with Andrew though, > since I got the email that this wa

Re: [PATCH] compiler-clang: remove version check for BPF Tracing

2020-11-04 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
r > clang sources. > > Cc: > Fixes: commit 1f7a44f63e6c ("compiler-clang: add build check for clang > 10.0.1") > Reported-by: Chen Yu > Reported-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers > --- Thank you, resolved my issue. Acked-by: Jarkko Sak

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
;> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > >> > &

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:40:19PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Got you... Well I now read the 2nd amendment now through, and yeah, kind > of way I work/function anyway. Ugh, looked up the word from dictionary for something that makes additions to some guidelines because did not kn

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:30:45PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > [...] > > > Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct- > > >

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:26:05PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800 > > Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat distu

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800 > Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat disturbed feedback from > > other maintainers) I can only make the conclusion that nobo

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:57:49PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 13:44 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language > > >

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:48:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarkko Sakkinen > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800 > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > >> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn&#x

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't > necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most heavily censored > medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain > contexts on most chan

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:35:07PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jens Axboe > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700 > > > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Nov 30,

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:31:13PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Like John I don't think that the word "fuck" is something we have to ban from > the source code, but I don't care too much. Anyway, please don't change it to > something like heck as it might be difficult for non-english speaker to

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:09:48PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Or just leave it as is because we're all grown up and don't freak out > when a piece of text contains the word "fuck". > > I still don't understand why people think that the word "fuck" is what > would keep certain groups

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:40:17AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > wrote: > > > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find > "hug

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:56:52AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > > wrote: > > > > > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > I

[PATCH RFC 10/15] net/sunhme: replace **** with a hug

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c index 863fd602fd33

[PATCH RFC 15/15] net: replace **** with a hug

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index a8217e221e19..8aadde6464a7 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core

Re: [PATCH 00/12] xen: add common function for reading optional value

2016-11-07 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:08:09AM +, David Vrabel wrote: > On 31/10/16 16:48, Juergen Gross wrote: > > There are multiple instances of code reading an optional unsigned > > parameter from Xenstore via xenbus_scanf(). Instead of repeating the > > same code over and over add a service function d

Re: [PATCH 00/26] constify local structures

2016-09-12 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:43:58PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Jarkko Sakkinen writes: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:54:07AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> > &g

Re: [PATCH 00/26] constify local structures

2016-09-12 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:52:08PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Jarkko Sakkinen writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:54:07AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > >>

Re: [PATCH 00/26] constify local structures

2016-09-12 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:54:07AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > Constify local structures. > > > > > > The semantic patch that

Re: [PATCH 00/26] constify local structures

2016-09-11 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Constify local structures. > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Just my two cents but: 1. You *can* use a static analysis too to find bugs or other issues. 2. However, you shoul