On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:07:19PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 14:59 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > Are you suggesting that the kernel has to keep macros around which
> > are of no use to the kernel itself just because glibc uses them?
>
> No, although in fact that _is_ th
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:51:07PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 14:43 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > +/* 2.6.19 kernel headers helpfully removed some macros and
> > + moved lots of stuff into new headers, some of which aren't
> > +
d variant.
I just hope further kernel header "cleanups" don't cause similar
breakage though.
2006-12-06 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netlinkaccess.h (struct ifaddrmsg): New type.
(IFA_UNSPEC, IFA_ADDRESS, IFA_LOCAL, IFA_
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > I am wondering about that too. IIRC, the IO_NOTIFY_* constants are not
> > part of the ABI, but only internal to the kernel implementation. I think
> > Zach had suggested inferring THREAD_ID notification if the pid specified
> > is
