-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 20, 2008 9:08 AM
Subject: sysfs network namespace support - was this patch set forgotten ?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I saw some posts (from about a month ago)
Hello,
net 2.6.25 is broken when building with the wireless/iwlwifi
subtree; we get the following errors (we noticed that iwl_down() and
iwl_resume()
implementation do exist in garzik tree, but there are more differences
so a simple
patch with only adding these two methods might be risky)
...
...
Hello,
I tried to understand what XFRM_POLICY_LOCALOK is for. (include/linux/xfrm.h)
It is defined thus:
#define XFRM_POLICY_LOCALOK1 /* Allow user to override global policy
*/
is it part of flags of xfrm_userpolicy_info?? I doubt this, since we have
above flags two defines:
#define
ped my eye. I suppose this is true also to
ipv4_devconf.arp_accept.
Rgs,
Ian
On Dec 24, 2007 2:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, in newer kernel version we have IPV4_DEVCONF_ALL(ARP_ACCEPT)
> > inste
Hello,
I have a question regarding unsolicited ARPs in ipv4/arp.c
As I understand, by default this feature is disabled;
How can one set this feature ?
When working with ipv4_devconf.arp_accept is 0 by default.
This is with 2.6.21 kernel.
I wanted ipv4_devconf.arp_accept to be set to 1.
I added:
unable to connect a socket (Connection refused)
fetch-pack from
'git://kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.25.git'
failed.
Ian
On Dec 5, 2007 4:03 PM, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ian Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec
Hello,
Sorry ; but is this tree can be fetched ? it requires a password.
I try:
git-clone kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.25.git net-2.6.25
and get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Ian
On Dec 5, 2007 3:47 PM, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "
OTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ian Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:49:52 +0200
>
> > This is a typo correction in net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c; it should be
> > "Copy neighbour" instead "Copy neighbout",
>
> Your email clien
Hello,
This is a typo correction in net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c; it should be
"Copy neighbour" instead "Copy neighbout",
Regards,
Ian Brown
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index cc86fb1..390dc7c 100
the
list of dst_entries ?
Regards,
Ian
On Nov 27, 2007 3:57 AM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > NOHASH hints that we do not keep the
> > an entry in a hash. I doubt that such dst_entries , which are crea
rt Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 3) in net/core/dst.c:
> > struct dst_entry *dst_destroy(struct dst_entry * dst)
> >{
> >...
> >...
> > int nohash = dst->flags &
Hello, netdev,
I try, in vain, to understand what is DST_NOHASH for.
I looked for DST_NOHASH under the linux source tree (http://lxr.linux.no/source)
and found that it appears in 4 files:
1) in include/net/dst.h (just defined there, #define DST_NOHASH 8)
2)
in xfrm4_policy.c:
static int
__xfrm4
Hi,
This might seem a little insane/crazy question; yet this is a real kernel
networking problem I encountered; I scratched my head a lot,
probed into the Linux kernel neighboring code, still could not
find an answer. And it still might be that the solution is a lot easier than
I can imagine in my
Hello,
Now it seems to me ok and I hope it can be applied cleanly. The only
change here is "Copy neighbour" instead "Copy neighbout" in the
comment in net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
Regards,
Ian Brown
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c 2007-09-0
Hello,
This is a trivial typo correction in net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c which
hunted my eye...
Regards,
Ian Brown
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.23-rc5-clean/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c 2007-09-01
09:08:24.0 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc5/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c2007-09
Hello,
Suppose a routing cache entry is added as a consequence of
a redirect to host ICMP message.
There is in include/linux.h two flags , one for entry which
is created and one for an entry which is modified because of a redirect:
#define RTF_DYNAMIC 0x0010 /* created dyn. (by red
Hello,
It seems to me that the following fields should be cleaned up as except the
definition, they do not appear anywhere in the kernel code:
a) since FASTROUTE is no longer used:
in include/linux/if_packet.h:
#define PACKET_FASTROUTE6 /* Fastrouted frame */
in includ
Hello,
I read a bit about netchannels in linux (according to Van Jacobson ideas).
I see that the last version of netchannels (20) is from:
Fri, 29 Dec 2006.
http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/blog/2006/12/29#2006_12_29
My question is : what is the status of the netchannels project ?
is there intentio
Hello,
I came across the e1000 download for linux in intel site.
I saw that in the readme they talk about Intel(R) I/O Acceleration Technology;
According to this readme , there is support for "systems using the
Intel(R) 5000 Series
Chipsets Integrated Device - 1A38".
see:
http://downloadmirror.in
Hello,
I had looked at the diagrams and read the explanations
about netfilter in Netfilter Architecture page:
http://netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-hacking-HOWTO-3.html
I want to make sure wheter I undestood something regarding
packets which are created locally (as opposed
to packet
Hello,
I see that setting the essid of a wireless card
(by iwconfig eth1 essid homenet)
triggers scanning;
namely , it calls ieee80211softmac_assoc_work() method which in
turn calls ieee80211softmac_start_scan().
I use zd1211 driver which works with the softmac layer
of the last git kernel.
I sa
Hello,
I am looking at 2.6.17-rc3 kernel.
I wonder: what is the origin of softmac in
2.6.17-rc3 kernel ?
I see in the *.c files under that folder:
Copyright (c) 2005, 2006 Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Joseph Jezak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Larry
22 matches
Mail list logo
