Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11

2006-10-31 Thread Holden Karau
The patch was based off the FIXME comment in the code [which suggested replacing 11 with the boundary for the regulatory domain]. I'll take a look at the vendors driver and see about modifying the patch to fit more with its logic or just limmiting it to the FCC regulatory domain. On 10/30/06, Uli

Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11

2006-10-30 Thread Holden Karau
Hi Ulrich, I'm fairly certain the patch is safe, even for non-US regulatory domains. Looking at the zd1211rw code the highest channel in the geo object would appear to be set in zd_geo_init as determined by zd_channel_range which just does a simple look up in channel_ranges[], so if this code be

Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11

2006-10-24 Thread Holden Karau
D]> wrote: Holden Karau wrote: > From: Holden Karau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.holdenkarau.com > > I have made a small patch for the zd1211rw driver which uses the > boundry channels of the regulatory domain, rather than the hard coded > values of 1 & 11. > Signe

[PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11

2006-10-23 Thread Holden Karau
From: Holden Karau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.holdenkarau.com I have made a small patch for the zd1211rw driver which uses the boundry channels of the regulatory domain, rather than the hard coded values of 1 & 11. Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www

[PATCH] 2.6.18 atmel iwlist stats patch

2006-09-28 Thread Holden Karau
From: Holden Karau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.holdenkarau.com I have made a small patch for the atmel driver [included in the 2.6.18 kernel] to output signal strength information as part of iwlist scan [before it did not output any signal strength related information]. Signed-off-by: