> From: Gui Jianfeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:58:21 +0800
>
>>>> I think the following code in fib6_del_route in the latest kernel is
>>>> useless.
>>>> 1125 if (fn->leaf == NULL && fn->fn_flags&
Hi Dave,
There are useless codes in fib6_del_route(). The following patch
has been tested, every thing looks fine, as usual.
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
fn->leaf becomes NULL when
last
route has been deleted, the radix tree should be expunged.
> But I am not completely convinced that all of these lines
> of code can be removed :-)
>
>
--
Regards
Gui Jianfeng
--
Gui Jianfeng
Hi all,
I think the following code in fib6_del_route in the latest kernel is useless.
1125 if (fn->leaf == NULL && fn->fn_flags&RTN_TL_ROOT)
1126 fn->leaf = &ip6_null_entry;
ip6_null_entry will never be unlinked from fn->leaf now, that is, fn->leaf ==
NULL will never meet.
Krishna Kumar2 写道:
> Gui Jianfeng wrote on 10/22/2007 11:37:07 AM:
>
>> @@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ static inline int ip_rcv_finish(struct s
>> * how the packet travels inside Linux networking.
>> */
>> if (skb->dst == NULL) {
>> - if (ip_route
Krishna Kumar2 写道:
> Gui Jianfeng wrote on 10/22/2007 11:37:07 AM:
>
>> @@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ static inline int ip_rcv_finish(struct s
>> * how the packet travels inside Linux networking.
>> */
>> if (skb->dst == NULL) {
>> - if (ip_route
Hi,
When kernel receives a package with a wrong destination ipv4 address, it can't
increase "InAddrErrors" number correctly.
InAddrErrors is located in /proc/net/snmp.
This is a patch for fixing this problem.
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -Nar
