Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-03 Thread Greg Banks
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 18:48, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Friday 03 February 2006 02:07, Greg Banks wrote: > > > > (Don't ask for code - it's not really in an usable state) > > > > Sure. I'm looking forward to it. > > I had actually shelved the idea b

RE: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-02 Thread Greg Banks
NICs for the two traffic types (for a number of reasons). What's the interface, some kind of ethtool extension or /proc magic? Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. I don't speak for SGI. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-02 Thread Greg Banks
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 18:51, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:31:49 +1100 > > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:45, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Normally TSO was supposed to fix that. > > > > Sure, except t

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-02 Thread Greg Banks
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 18:48, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 08:31, Greg Banks wrote: > > > [...]SGI's solution is do is ship a script that uses ethtool > > at boot to tune rx-usecs, rx-frames, rx-usecs-irq, rx-frames-irq > > up from the defaults. &

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-01 Thread Greg Banks
're very grateful ;-) But a scheme which used the interrupt mitigation hardware dynamically based on load could reduce the irq rate and CPU usage even further without compromising latency at low load. On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:51, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 04:19, Greg Ba

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-01 Thread Greg Banks
g up to around 1 MiB+1KiB in total length. Also, nfsd doesn't cork/uncork. Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. I don't speak for SGI. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [E

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-01 Thread Greg Banks
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 14:13, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:06:06 +1100 > > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 13:46, David S. Miller wrote: > > > I know SAMBA is using sendfile() (when the client has the oplock

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-01 Thread Greg Banks
ideas in mind for TX net channels that I touched > upon briefly with him, and we'll see some more things in this area, we > just need to be patient. :) Cool. Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. I don't speak for SGI. - To unsubscri

Re: Van Jacobson net channels

2006-02-01 Thread Greg Banks
a few days to reflect, I'm curious as to how the tx is improved. Van didn't touch upon the tx side at all, and cpu usage on tx is a significant part of the CPU usage issues for many interesting NFS workloads. The other objections raised here are non-issues for an NFS or Samba server. Greg. --