ition.
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 6:05 PM
> To: Kok, Auke
> Cc: David Mack; Herbert Xu; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>
> On Thu,
It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
Huge thanks and great work, guys.
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Kok, Auke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM
> To: Herbert Xu
>
6, 2007 7:35 AM
> To: Eric Sandeen
> Cc: David Mack; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:15AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >
> > Hm... running 2.6.23-6.fc8, I&#x
> Cc: Herbert Xu; netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> David Mack
> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:10:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> > Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote
If I understand the message Dave Jones sent yesterday, the patch you
mention *was* applied to the e100 driver in 2.6.23-6.fc8?
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Herbert Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 8:36 AM
> To: David Mack
> Cc: Dave J
