On 04/18/18 at 06:01pm, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 04/18/18, 2018 at 11:45:46 +0530, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi Rahul,
> > On 04/17/18 at 01:14pm, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > > On production servers running variety of workloads over time, kernel
> > &
Hi Rahul,
On 04/17/18 at 01:14pm, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> On production servers running variety of workloads over time, kernel
> panic can happen sporadically after days or even months. It is
> important to collect as much debug logs as possible to root cause
> and fix the problem, that may not b
Hi,
On 12/11/15 at 03:26pm, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 09:37 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > Seems there're a lot of other wireless messages. Should we refactor
> > them as well? I still did not get chance to see where is the code.
> > (My wireless
Hi, Johannes
Sorry for late feedback, I was busying on other things.
On 12/11/15 at 03:38pm, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 15:31 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > cfg80211 module prints a lot of messages like below. Actually
> > printing once is acceptable but sometime
On 11/20/15 at 12:55pm, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 19:25 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2015-11-15, Dave Young wrote:
> > > cfg80211 module prints a lot of messages like below. Actually
> > > printing once is accep
On 11/15/15 at 03:25pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/13/15 at 02:54pm, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov
> >
> > When __netdev_update_features() was updated to ensure some features are
> > disabled on new lower devices, an error was introduced for d
On 11/15/15 at 09:38am, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 15:31 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > cfg80211 module prints a lot of messages like below. Actually printing
> > once is acceptable but sometimes it will print again and again, it looks
> > very annoying. It is b
Hi,
On 11/15/15 at 07:25pm, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2015-11-15, Dave Young wrote:
> > cfg80211 module prints a lot of messages like below. Actually printing
> > once is acceptable but sometimes it will print again and again, it looks
> > very annoy
)
cfg80211: (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 8 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm), (N/A)
cfg80211: (5724 KHz - 6372 KHz @ 216 KHz), (N/A, 0 mBm), (N/A)
The changes in this patch is to replace pr_info with pr_debug in function
print_rd_rules and print_regdomain_info
Signed-off-by: Dave Young
---
net
v.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -6426,6 +6426,8 @@ int __netdev_update_features(struct net_device *dev)
>
> if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features)
> err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features(dev, features);
> + else
> + err = 0;
&g
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Louis JANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I ever asked marcel about the coding style. please see following thread:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/22/91
> >
> > I think the style problem marcel said is
> > 1. using kernel codeing style
> > 2. marcel's style
Sorry, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was missed in cc
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quote mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> >
> > 200
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quote mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>
> 2007/12/17 Louis JANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I attached two patches. the first one(bluez-kernel-forcesco.
On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:55 +0800
>
> > Move hci_dev_put to del_conn to avoid hci dev going away before hci conn.
>
> This looks correct so I have appl
hci conn child devices other than rfcomm tty should not be moved here.
This is my lost, thanks for Barnaby's reporting and testing.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff
Move hci_dev_put to del_conn to avoid hci dev going away before hci conn.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c |1 -
net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c |5 -
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -upr linux/net/bluetooth/hci_
On Feb 1, 2008 10:33 AM, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:24:41 +0800
>
>
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 30 2008, Dave Young wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30 2008, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > The bluetooth hci_conn sysfs add/del executed in the default workqueue.
> > If the del_conn is executed after the new add_conn with same target,
> > add_conn
iled with warning of "same kobject name".
> > >
> > > Here add btaddconn & btdelconn workqueues,
> > > flush the btdelconn workqueue in the add_conn function to avoid the issue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
_conn function to avoid the issue.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -upr a/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c 2008-01-30 10:14:27.0 +0800
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c 2008-01-30 10:14:14.0
On Jan 24, 2008 5:25 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 11:02 AM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > =
> > [ INFO: possible recursive locking de
On Jan 24, 2008 5:54 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
>
> Hi Dave (& others),
>
> > Thanks.
>
> Thanks a lot, I was first to ignore all these because they occurred
> with newreno, but looked again... :-/
>
On Jan 24, 2008 11:02 AM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> =
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 #8
> -
> bluepush/3213 is trying to acquire lock:
>
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.24-rc8-mm1 #8
-
bluepush/3213 is trying to acquire lock:
(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){--..}, at: []
l2cap_sock_bind+0x40/0x100 [l2cap]
but task is already holding
On Jan 23, 2008 7:01 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 23, 2008 3:41 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > &
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:19:26AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:06:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:16 +0100 Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> >
, should be rfcomm-tty-destroy-before-tty_close.
2. Don't know what I was thinking that time, could you replace it with the
following better one? Sorry for that.
---
rfcomm dev could be deleted in tty_hangup, so we must not call rfcomm_dev_del
again to prevent from destroying rfcomm dev before
On Jan 23, 2008 3:41 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote:
>
> > From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:44:30 +0800
> >
> > > On Jan 22, 2008 6:47 PM, Ilp
On Jan 22, 2008 6:47 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > On Jan 22, 2008 12:37 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jan 22, 2008 5:14 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Jan 22, 2008 5:09 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 12:37 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 22, 2008 5:14 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008,
On Jan 22, 2008 12:37 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 5:14 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > > Please see the kernel messages following,(trigged while usi
On Jan 22, 2008 2:18 PM, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> > > Add people missed in cc-list.
> >
> > Thanks Dave for your continued efforts on Bluetooth bugs like this.
> >
> > Marcel, are you going to review/ACK/integrate/push-upstream/whatever
> > any of these Bluetooth pa
On Jan 22, 2008 5:14 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > Please see the kernel messages following,(trigged while using some qemu
> > session)
> > BTW, seems there's some e100 error message as well.
Please see the kernel messages following,(trigged while using some qemu session)
BTW, seems there's some e100 error message as well.
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1b.0 to 64
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.23-k4-NAPI
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation
ACPI: PC
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:49:13PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> The rfcomm tty device will possibly retain even when conn is down,
> and sysfs doesn't support zombie device moving, so this patch
> move the tty device before conn device is destroyed.
>
> For the bug refered
The rfcomm tty device will possibly retain even when conn is down,
and sysfs doesn't support zombie device moving, so this patch
move the tty device before conn device is destroyed.
For the bug refered please see :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/28/87
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL P
_hangup/rfcomm_dev_state_change/rfcomm_release_dev),
So add another BUG_ON when the rfcomm_dev_del is called more than one time.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c | 22 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff -upr linux/
On Nov 23, 2007 2:19 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andy, I like your idea. IMHO, as Rusty said a simple EXPORT_SYMBOL_TO
> > is better.
>
> I don't think so. e.g. tcpcong would be very very messy this way.
>
> > And I wonder if it is possible to export to something like the stru
On Nov 22, 2007 11:56 AM, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2007 13:43:06 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > There seems to be rough consensus that the kernel currently has too many
> > exported symbols. A lot of these exports are generally usable utility
> > functions or import
>On 8/10/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 8/10/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:18:38 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > 2.6.23-rc2-m
40 matches
Mail list logo
