G'day people
Coverity CID 1160 & 1161
These are probably fixed in some external tree, but in case they are
not, here is a patch
Compile tested with allyesconfig
Remove some dead cose from bcm43xx_sysfs.c in 2.6.18-rc6
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- drive
Sorry people I have done it again!
Both Coverity CID 1160 and 1161 are for the same file.
I will whip up a combined patch
Darren J.
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 17:27 +1000, Darren Jenkins\ wrote:
> G'day people,
>
> Coverity CID 1161
>
> This is probably fixed in some extern
G'day people,
Coverity CID 1161
This is probably fixed in some external tree, but in case it isn't, here is a
patch
Compile tested with allyesconfig
Remove some dead code from bcm43xx_sysfs.c in 2.6.18-rc6
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- drivers/net/
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:12 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>GFP_KERNEL);
>
> If it's too big for kzalloc then it's too big for kcalloc too.
>
> -Andi
Thanks for that.
I seem to have been rather confused about the difference between
kzalloc, and kcalloc.
Darren J.
-
To unsubsc
ude/linux/slab.h:128:
__you_cannot_kzalloc_that_much();
The patch below fixes the compilation with 'make allyesconfig'.
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.16-git13/drivers/net/arcnet/com90xx.c.orig2006-03-28
01:44:44.0 +1100
+++ l
)
+ #define MOTO_SROM_BUG((lp->active >= DE4X5_MAX_PHY) ||
(((le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned(((s32 *)dev->dev_addr&0x00ff)==0x3e0008
as this seems to make sense, but as i am not sure that this bug happens
when (lp->active < 8) I am reluctant to change this.
Signed-o
