existing
> matching compatible strings. While it's not ideal to have the same
> top-level SoC compatible and having another sub-node within that SoC's
> DTS have the same compatible, given this would be break backwards
> compatibility, cannot you stay with what is defined today?
U-boot for MT7621 doesn't support device tree, and the kernel image
is always packaged with dt. Do we need to maintain backward
compatibility at all in this situation?
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
times before giving up.
Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo
---
On my mt7622 board mt7615_load_patch always fails the first time
and it then succeeded on the first retry added by this patch.
"10 times" is an arbitarily picked value and it'll still leave a
broken phy behind if all 10 retries
belong to this switch at all and I think this
approach should not be followed further by future code.
The usage of mac5 should be explicitly defined as a dt property
under mt753x node.
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
a new thread if
you'd like to propose these fundamental behaviour changes,
because this patch is already a result of previously proposed
behaviour changes being rejected.
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
