Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> There was a small bug in my patch (broken return value on memory
> allocation failure, not relevant for testing though). I'll push
> the fixed patch to Dave once Chris confirms that it fixes the
> problem he's seeing.
>
Looks like that may have done it. I ramped up th
jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-19-03 at 19:22 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> Can you just replace the above with dev->queue_lock and see if
>> that makes your problem go away? THanks.
>>
>
> It should;
> i will stare at the code later and see if i can send a better patch,
> maybe a read_lock(qdi
gt;ops->change(tp, cl, t->tcm_handle, tca, &fh);
Simply reordering these seems to ameliorate the problem greatly. I
don't know if this is a generic solution or something specific to the
basic filter only.
Chris Madden
jamal wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 08:29 +0100, Patrick McHa
