> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Williams [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 7:13 PM
> To: Chiappero, Marco ; Jiri Benc
>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; David S . Miller ; Kirsher,
> Jeffrey T ; Duyck, Alexander H
> ; Grandhi, Sainath
> ; Mah
> -Original Message-
> From: Jiri Benc [mailto:jb...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 5:44 PM
> To: Chiappero, Marco
> Cc: Dan Williams ; netdev@vger.kernel.org; David S .
> Miller ; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> ; Duyck, Alexander H
> ; Grandhi, Sainath
> ;
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Dan Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 5:09 PM
> To: Chiappero, Marco ; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: David S . Miller ; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> ; Duyck, Al
> -Original Message-
> From: Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Marco Chiappero
> wrote:
> > Currently every slave device gets assigned the same MAC address, by
> > having it copied from the master interface. Since some code paths
> > depend on this ident
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Williams [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:51 +0100, Marco Chiappero wrote:
> > > Currently all the slave devices belonging to the same port inherit
> > > their MAC address from it
