The array subscript increments after the execution of the statement.
So there is no issue here. However it helps to read the code better.
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers
We noticed performance issues with VF interface on sparc compared
to PF. Setting the RX to IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN brings it
on far with PF. Also this matches to the default sparc setting in
PF driver.
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger
Acked-by: Sowmini Varadhan
---
v2:
Alexander had concerns
Hi Alex,
On 4/21/2016 2:22 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> Current code writes the tx/rx relaxed order without reading it first.
>>> This can lead to
with VF interface.
Fixed it by reading the registers first and setting the specific
bit of interest. With this change we are able to match the bandwidth
equivalent to PF interface.
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c |9 +++--
1 files changed
