On 4/20/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as checked in packet_set_ring, buffer size must be a multiple of PAGE_SIZE,
> packet_set_ring
> if (unlikely(req->tp_block_size &
On 4/20/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch works properly on my side. But
> 1) I'm not sure why you re-wrote alloc/free_pg_vec function, doesn't
> the current implement work for NOMMU? I know you wan
On 4/18/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here, in the attachment I wrote a small test app. Please correct if
> there is anything wrong, and feel free to improve it.
Okay... I have that working... probably. I don'
On 4/18/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here, in the attachment I wrote a small test app. Please correct if
> there is anything wrong, and feel free to improve it.
Okay... I have that working... probably. I don'
On 4/11/07, Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue 10 Apr 2007 08:55, David Howells pondered:
> Looking at alloc_pg_vec() in af_packet.c, I will place my bets on the
> latter case. I don't know that this is a problem; it depends on how things
> work, and that I don't know offhand. If some
In net poll mode, the current checksum function doesn't consider the
kind of packet which is padded to reach a specific minimum length. I
believe that's the problem causing my test case failed. The following
patch fixed this issue.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey.Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/core/netpoll
On 4/12/07, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
> I think we discussed this issue before.
>
> The current checksum function doesn't consider the kind of packet
> which is padded to reach a specific minimum length. I believe that's
>
I think we discussed this issue before.
The current checksum function doesn't consider the kind of packet
which is padded to reach a specific minimum length. I believe that's
the problem caused my test case failed. Is this issue fixed? Or is it
acceptable if I make a patch not calculating this ki
The option CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP should depend on MMU.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey.Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/packet/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/packet/Kconfig b/net/packet/Kconfig
index 34ff93f..959c272 100644
--- a/net/packet/Kconfig
+++ b/net
